Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40123512›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

Tobacco Assessment in Actively Accruing National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Network Trials.

Sarah N Price, Stephanie R Land, Kinsey Pebley, Margaret C Fahey, Amanda M Palmer, Marcia H McCall, Pamela J Raper, Alana M Rojewski, Ivana T Croghan, Lynne I Wagner and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah N PriceDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1622-1700
Stephanie R LandTobacco Control Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kinsey PebleyMedical University of South Carolina Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7497-6247
Margaret C FaheyMedical University of South Carolina Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-8785
Amanda M PalmerMedical University of South Carolina Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5833-034X
Marcia H McCallDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Pamela J RaperDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Alana M RojewskiMedical University of South Carolina Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1531-9287
Ivana T CroghanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Nicotine Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lynne I WagnerDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Benjamin A TollMedical University of South Carolina Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7978-8416

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Cancer Prevention And Control Training Grant (CAPACITY)T32CA122061 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KRISTIE L FOLEY, Kathryn Elizabeth Weaver · 2019 to 2026
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420NCI NIH HHS T32 CA122061NCI NIH HHS T32CA122061Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute UL1TR001420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTobacco use can adversely affect cancer treatment outcomes, yet routine assessment has not been fully incorporated into oncology clinical trials. In 2012, rates of tobacco use assessment in actively accruing National Cancer Institute (NCI) trials were < 30% at enrollment and < 5% during follow-up, prompting efforts by the NCI and major oncology associations to promote and standardize tobacco assessment in oncology research and practice (including development of the Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire [C-TUQ]). This study was conducted to re-examine assessment patterns in 2022 (including utilization of the C-TUQ) and evaluate progress. AIMS AND

methodsProtocols and forms from 144 actively accruing (as of December 2022) NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) trials were evaluated using a standardized coding instrument.

resultsOf 144 trials, 49.3% assessed tobacco use at enrollment (43.8% measured cigarettes, 14.8% e-cigarettes, and ≤ 12.5% other tobacco products). Approximately 20.8% used at least one C-TUQ question, but only 3.5% used all four core items. Few measured second-hand smoke exposure (3.5%) or quit interest (2.8%). At follow-up, 8.3% assessed any form of tobacco use. Assessment rates were higher in smoking-related cancer trials.

conclusionsAlmost half of the accruing trials did not measure any tobacco use and fewer used the C-TUQ. There was a ≥ 70% increase in tobacco use assessment at enrollment and follow-up compared to 2012, an improvement with room for further enhancement. Standardized tobacco use information enhances investigators' ability to estimate cancer treatment efficacy, offer equitable cessation support, and accurately understand the impact of tobacco use on treatment outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: In 2012, few (< 30%) cancer clinical trials evaluated tobacco use at enrollment and < 5% did so during follow-up, prompting efforts to promote and standardize tobacco assessment in oncology research and practice (including the development of the Cancer Patient Tobacco Use Questionnaire [C-TUQ]). The present study builds on this foundational paper and finds an overall increase in tobacco use assessment with room for improvement: 49.3% of trials in 2022 assessed tobacco use at enrollment and 8.3% did so during follow-up. About 20.8% used at least one C-TUQ question, highlighting that tobacco use assessment is not yet fully incorporated into oncology clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicNeoplasmsTobacco UseHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Surveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ProductsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40123512
PMCPMC12453689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.