Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40123313›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Optical surface information-based respiratory phase-sorting and motion-incorporated reconstruction for SPECT imaging.

Chenguang Li, Lucas A Polson, Xuzhou Wu, Yibao Zhang, Carlos Uribe, Arman Rahmim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenguang LiDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Lucas A PolsonDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Xuzhou WuInstitute of Biopharmaceutical and Health Engineering, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yibao ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Carlos UribeDepartment of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Arman RahmimDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation Z210008China International Talent Exchange Foundation JC202502001FCIHR PJT-180251Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities/Clinical Medicine Plus X - Young Scholars Project of Peking University PKU2024LCXQ033National Natural Science Foundation of China 12275012National Natural Science Foundation of China 12411530076National Natural Science Foundation of China 12475309National Natural Science Foundation of China 82202941Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2019-06467Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2021-02965Ten Thousand People Project of Ministry of Education 7111400062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory motion during the single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) acquisition can cause blurring artifacts in the reconstructed images, leading to inaccurate estimates for activity and absorbed doses. PURPOSE: To address the impact of respiratory motion, we utilized a new optical surface imaging (OSI) system to extract the respiratory signals for phase sorting and verified its effectiveness through simulation and patient data. Additionally, we implemented GPU-accelerated motion-incorporated reconstruction algorithms for the SPECT projections, integrating motion information to produce motion-free images from all acquired data.

methodsWe used the 4D XCAT Phantom to generate attenuation maps and activity images across different respiratory phases, with activity distributions based on patient images. SPECT projections were simulated using the SIMIND Monte Carlo program with Poisson noise. The OSI system was modeled by introducing Gaussian noise into the point clouds on the body surface within the attenuation map. The body surface images were registered across phases using a Gaussian mixture model combined with principal component analysis. The extracted respiratory signals were compared to the center-of-light (COL) approach, with or without filtering and kidney masking. The OSI method was further validated by comparing respiratory signals derived from a real patient using OSI to simultaneous cone-beam CT (CBCT) projections. Two motion-incorporated techniques, namely, 4D reconstruction (4D-Recon) and post-reconstruction registration and summation (post-Recon), were compared with non-motion-corrected images (non-MC) and single-phase gating (Gating). The quantitative evaluation of image quality utilized recovery coefficients (RC), contrast recovery coefficients (CRC), and uncertainty estimation.

resultsIn simulation, the correlation between the ground-truth and OSI-based signals remained high and stable (0.99 ± 0.004, p-value

conclusionsOur novel respiratory signal extraction approach based on OSI demonstrated superior accuracy and reliability compared to a data-driven method. Applying motion-incorporated SPECT reconstruction using these accurate breathing signals has the potential to enhance image quality and improve absorbed dose quantification in radiopharmaceutical therapy. The relevant reconstruction algorithms are also made available for public use in the open-source library PyTomography.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedRespirationTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAlgorithmsHumansMovementPhantoms, Imagingnonrigid motion correctionquantitative SPECTrespiratory‐gated 4D imagingsurface tracking

Identifiers

PMID40123313
PMCPMC12149718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.