ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2025
The PreGen Research Program: Implementing Prenatal Genomic Testing in Australia-A Commentary.
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "The Way We Do Things is Unsustainable"-Exploring Symptoms of Burnout Among Healthcare Professionals in Prenatal Genomics.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Experiences of Dutch parents undergoing prenatal genomic testing for fetal structural anomalies: A prospective qualitative analysis.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prenatal genomic sequencing, which can provide a significantly increased diagnostic rate for fetal structural anomaly (FSA) compared with karyotype and microarray, is not available uniformly across Australia. PreGen, a 5-year translational research program, has identified significant barriers to implementation including access to funding, the availability of genomic testing, access to termination of pregnancy services and the availability of specialist genomic centres. A federal item number for prenatal genomic testing would increase equitable test availability and reduce delays to diagnoses by making them in pregnancy whilst removing the need for low-yield diagnostic interventions and enabling personalised patient management and family support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.