Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40123286›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2025

Advances in Adjuvant Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Perspectives on Risk Stratification and Treatment Outcomes.

Junya Furukawa, Ryotaro Tomida, Kei Daizumoto, Yutaro Sasaki, Tomoya Fukawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The evolution of renal cell carcinoma classification.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026
    Review
  4. Editorial Comment on Advances in Adjuvant Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Perspectives on Risk Stratification and Treatment Outcomes.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junya FurukawaDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8974-9218
Ryotaro TomidaDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Kei DaizumotoDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Yutaro SasakiDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1953-0776
Tomoya FukawaDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7806-3667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical surgery is effective for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, recurrence occurs in up to 40% of patients, underscoring the need for adjuvant therapy to improve the prognosis. Historically, adjuvant treatments, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have shown limited success, failing to improve overall survival. The introduction of the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, as demonstrated in the KEYNOTE-564 trial, has revolutionized the field by showing significant overall survival benefits and prompting updates to RCC treatment guidelines. Accurate risk assessment is critical for identifying high-risk patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy. Established risk models, such as the UCLA Integrated Staging System and the Leibovich score, incorporate clinical and pathological factors to stratify recurrence risk. Recent enhancements in these models have improved predictive accuracy, enabling better optimization of inclusion criteria for clinical trials targeting high-risk recurrence and the development of individualized surveillance protocols to refine patient selection for adjuvant treatment. This review examines the evolution of risk stratification models and adjuvant therapy for RCC, highlighting the potential of innovative biomarkers, such as liquid biopsies, to further enhance patient selection and optimize treatment outcomes. Ongoing clinical trials investigating new combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors hold promise, and integrating accurate risk assessment with advanced immunotherapy will be key to improving postoperative survival rates for patients with RCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKidneyNeoplasm StagingNephrectomyPatient SelectionPrognosisRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsadjuvantrenal cell carcinomarisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40123286
PMCPMC12230916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.