ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Modulation of Sensory Input to the Spinal Cord by Peripheral Afferent Fibres via GABAergic Astrocytes.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new paradigm of bidirectional regulation of the gut-spinal cord axis.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Metabolite 2-aminoadipic acid: implications for metabolic disorders and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A long-lasting GABA-dependent increase in the excitability of afferent fibres, and thus modulation of the sensory input to the spinal cord, may be evoked by epidural polarization. However, the direct effects of fibre polarization are short-lasting and the sustained increase in their excitability appears to be secondary to the release of GABA from nearby astrocytes. We have now investigated whether the modulation of spinal sensory input by stimulation of a peripheral nerve, previously attributed to synaptically evoked intraspinal field potentials, is evoked in a similar way. However, as neither its dependence on GABA nor its relays have been investigated, we addressed the question of whether the increase in the excitability of epidurally stimulated afferent fibres following a peripheral nerve stimulation does or does not depend on GABA and whether it might be mediated by astrocytes. The effects of conditioning stimulation of the tibial nerve were evaluated from changes in the excitability of both Group I and II muscle afferents, estimated from action potentials recorded in peripheral nerves and in field potentials recorded in the dorsal horn respectively in acute experiments on deeply anaesthetized rats. The excitability of the afferents was increased by stimulation of Group II and/or cutaneous but not Group I muscle afferents. The effects were significantly weakened by blocking GABA channels by gabazine and by astrocyte toxin L-alpha-aminoadipic acid (L-AAA), indicating that the excitability of both Group I and II afferent fibres may be modulated by GABAergic astrocytes, the new role played by astrocytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.