SynthesisBrain and behavior2025
Unraveling the Controversy: The Causal Link Between Osteoarthritis and Alzheimer's Disease.
Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Identifying potential drug targets for tourette syndrome: a Mendelian randomization study based on druggable genes.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesResearch on osteoarthritis (OA) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is currently highly controversial, and the upstream and downstream relationships between them remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between OA and AD using Mendelian randomization (MR).
methodSummary data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were obtained for OA and AD. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables (IVs), and significant (p < 5.0 × 10
resultsThe MR results showed a positive causal effect of AD and OA (IVW OR = 19.89, 95% CI = 2.90-136.57, p = 0.002; OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.11-1.47, p = 0.017; OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.11-1.46, p = 0.017) and no significance of the reverse MR results (p > 0.05). Meta-analysis of the MR results confirmed this finding and was significant in all population subgroups (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.18-1.40). The findings were maintained after controlling confounders using MVMR (OR = 6.75, 95% CI = 1.50-30.44, p = 0.013). These analyses were confirmed to be reliable and stable by sensitivity testing.
conclusionsOur study found a positive causal effect of OA and AD, which was confirmed by the highest levels of evidence-based medicine. It may provide meaningful evidence for the current controversy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.