ArticleThoracic cancer2025
Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Advanced or Recurrent Thymic Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-angiogenic therapy in thymic carcinoma: a narrative review of current evidence and emerging combinations.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2026Review
- Systemic therapy for advanced thymic epithelial tumors: a narrative review of current evidence and perspectives.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2026Review
- Oncologic strategies and options for the management of metastatic thymic carcinoma.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2026Review
- The Impact of Radioiodine (131I) Therapy of Thyroid Disease on Salivary Glands Function and Inflammation: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLenvatinib is recommended for the treatment of advanced and recurrent thymic carcinomas. However, there is a paucity of data on lenvatinib's use in real-world clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients with thymic carcinoma.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of lenvatinib in the treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent thymic carcinoma between March 2021 and March 2024.
resultsTwenty-seven patients from six institutions in Japan were enrolled in this study. The median progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were 9.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8-14.5), 33% (95% CI 16.5%-54%), and 85% (95% CI 66.3%-95.8%), respectively. Although the number of patients was small, the median PFS of the first-, second-, and third- or later-line treatment groups was 21.3 months (n = 5), 9.0 months (n = 13), and 5.8 months (n = 9) (p = 0.171), respectively. Dose reduction was required in all patients, with 17 (63%) presenting grade ≥ 3 adverse events, including hypertension in seven patients and proteinuria in six. No grade ≥ 4 adverse events were observed.
conclusionThe real-world efficacy and safety of lenvatinib are consistent with those reported in previous clinical trials of second-line lenvatinib. Furthermore, despite the relatively small sample size, our findings suggest that lenvatinib may be effective for the treatment of thymic carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.