Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40122980›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2025

Generalizability of trial criteria on amyloid-lowering therapy against Alzheimer's disease to individuals with mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer's disease in the general population.

Jacqueline J Claus, Ilse Vom Hofe, Annekee van Ijlzinga Veenstra, Silvan Licher, Harro Seelaar, Frank J de Jong, Julia Neitzel, Meike W Vernooij, M Arfan Ikram, Frank J Wolters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Plasma inflammatory biomarker profiles across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum in the Bio-Hermes cohort.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jacqueline J ClausDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7047-7064
Ilse Vom HofeDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Annekee van Ijlzinga VeenstraDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Silvan LicherDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Harro SeelaarDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank J de JongDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Julia NeitzelDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Meike W VernooijDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M Arfan IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank J WoltersDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. f.j.wolters@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

Alzheimer's Association AARF-22-924982Hartstichting CVON2018-28ZonMw #10510032120003ZonMw Veni-09150162010108 and BIRD-NL-10510032120005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment with anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies slowed cognitive decline in recent RCTs in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, stringent trial eligibility criteria may affect generalisability to clinical practice. We extracted eligibility criteria for trials of aducanumab, lecanemab and donanemab, and applied these to participants with MCI and early clinical AD dementia from the population-based Rotterdam Study. Participants underwent questionnaires, genotyping, brain-MRI, cognitive testing, and cardiovascular assessment. We determined amyloid status using a validated prediction model based on age and APOE-genotype. Of 968 participants (mean age: 75 years, 56% women), 779 had MCI and 189 dementia. Across trials, around 40% of participants would be ineligible because of predicted amyloid negativity. At least one clinical exclusion criterion was present in 76.3% of participants for aducanumab, 75.8% for lecanemab, and 59.8% for donanemab. Common criteria were cardiovascular disease (35.2%), anticoagulant (31.2%), psychotropic or immunological medication use (20.4%), anxiety or depression (15.9%), or lack of social support (15.6%). One-third were ineligible based on brain-MRI findings alone, similar across trials and predominantly due to cerebral small-vessel disease. Combining amyloid, clinical, and imaging criteria, eligibility ranged from 9% (95% CI:7.0-11.1) for aducanumab, 8% (6.2-9.9) lecanemab to 15% (12.4-17.5) for donanemab. Findings from recent RCTs reporting protective effects of monoclonal antibodies against amyloid-β are applicable to less than 15% of community-dwelling individuals with MCI or early AD. These findings underline that evidence for drug efficacy and safety is lacking for the vast majority of patients with MCI/AD in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCognitive DysfunctionPatient SelectionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleaducanumabAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAlzheimer’s diseaseAmyloidClinical trialsGeneralisabilityMonoclonal antibodies

Identifiers

PMID40122980
PMCPMC12137428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.