ArticleScientific reports2025
Superiority and characteristics of visual motion discriminability in collegiate table tennis players.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Table tennis (TT) players, through repetitive exposure to visual motion, may develop enhanced visual motion discriminability due to perceptual learning. This study compared visual motion direction discrimination (MDD) abilities among TT, soccer (SC) players, and track and field (TF) athletes using random dot kinematogram tests. Participants discriminated the direction of coherently moving dots with and without surrounding dots randomly moving (background noise). TT and SC players significantly outperformed TF athletes in MDD tasks at specific visual field eccentricities. TT players showed superior discriminability in near-peripheral vision, likely due to the frequent need to track a ball in this area during play. In contrast, SC players excelled in far-peripheral vision, reflecting their experience monitoring a broader visual field. This advantage was pronounced in conditions with background noise, emphasizing the importance of figure-ground segregation for extracting the motion specific to the athlete's behavioral decision from various surrounding motions. We conclude that the sport-specific visual experiences of TT and SC players, particularly their repeated exposure to unique visual motion environments, lead to enhanced motion discriminability that is finely tuned to their respective sport's demands. This improvement supports superior visuomotor performance and underscores perceptual learning's adaptability to the distinct challenges in different sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.