Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40122962›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Vault of the phakic intraocular lens during vertical and horizontal fixation within patient comparison.

Masayuki Ouchi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Masayuki OuchiMasayuki Ouchi Eye Clinic, 9-1 Okuni-cho, Minami-ku, Kyoto city, 6018449, Japan. mouchi@skyblue.ocn.ne.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the postoperative vault and preoperative predictions between vertical and horizontal fixation of implantable collamer lenses (ICLs). In this prospective case series, 63 patients (126 eyes) who underwent bilateral ICL insertion for myopia were randomly assigned to either horizontal or vertical fixation for each eye. An additional control group consisted of 63 patients receiving bilateral horizontal non-toric ICL fixation. Biometric measurements, including anterior chamber depth (ACD) and vault, were obtained using anterior-segment three-dimensional optical coherence tomography preoperatively and at 2 h, 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively. ACD values remained stable and similar between both groups (P > 0.05). However, vault values were consistently lower in the vertical group than in the horizontal group at all time points (P < 0.001). The vault difference between preoperative predictions and actual measurements was significantly larger in the vertical group compared to the horizontal group (P < 0.001). The intergroup vault difference was significantly larger than the left-right eye difference in the control group (P < 0.001). Vertical ICL fixation reduced the vault by approximately 150 μm compared to horizontal fixation, a deviation from preoperative predictions, which should be considered when determining ICL size.

Indexed as

Lens Implantation, IntraocularMyopiaPhakic Intraocular LensesAdultAnterior ChamberFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40122962
PMCPMC11930951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.