Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40122921›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Possible prevention of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy by concomitant use of α1-receptor antagonist based on a retrospective study.

Kohei Mori, Takehiro Kawashiri, Keisuke Mine, Haruna Ishida, Yusuke Mori, Mami Ueda, Yusuke Koura, Shunsuke Fujita, Akito Tsuruta, Nobuaki Egashira and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kohei MoriDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Takehiro KawashiriDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. kawashiri.takehiro.650@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7708-2855
Keisuke MineDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Haruna IshidaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yusuke MoriDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Mami UedaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yusuke KouraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Shunsuke FujitaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Akito TsurutaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-0302
Nobuaki EgashiraDepartment of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3673-6824
Ichiro IeiriDepartment of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3543-2562
Satoru KoyanagiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4849-2377
Takao ShimazoeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3584-1603
Daisuke KobayashiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7312-9919

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP20K07198JST Next Generation Challenging Research Program JPMJSP2136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePaclitaxel and albumin-bound paclitaxel are important anticancer drugs for the treatment of non-small cell lung, pancreatic, gastric, and gynecological cancers; however, they cause peripheral neuropathy as an adverse reaction. Therefore, prophylaxis and treatment for peripheral neuropathy are needed, since there are no sufficient evidence-based strategies to prevent it. Our previous animal research and adverse effect database analysis studies have identified the potential of α1 antagonists to attenuate paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the prophylactic potential of α1 antagonists for PIPN in patients with cancer.

methodsData were collected from the medical records of 673 male patients aged 18 years and older who started treatment with paclitaxel- or albumin-bound paclitaxel-containing regimens at Kyushu University Hospital between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019. The two primary outcome measures were PIPN occurrence and paclitaxel discontinuation due to PIPN. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for cumulative doses and evaluated using the log-rank test.

resultsThe percentage of patients in whom PIPN occurred (any grade) during the entire study period was 37.4% and 20.0% in without and with α1-receptor antagonist groups, respectively (P = 0.0101, χ

conclusionsThe present retrospective cohort study may suggest that concomitant use of α1-receptor antagonists may moderate the development of PIPN.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicNeoplasmsPaclitaxelPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPaclitaxelPaclitaxelPeripheral neuropathyProphylaxisRetrospective cohort studyα1-Receptor antagonist

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.