ArticleScientific reports2025
High-speed threat detection in 5G SDN with particle swarm optimizer integrated GRU-driven generative adversarial network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Explainable Federated Intrusion Detection Framework for SDN Using Distributed Key Generation and Threshold Homomorphic Encryption.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design of an AI-driven secure 5G-SDN framework with federated reinforcement learning for anomaly detection, mitigation, and attack forensics.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting attacks in 5G software-defined network (SDN) environments requires a comprehensive approach that leverages traditional security measures, such as firewalls, intrusion prevention systems, and specialized techniques personalized to the unique characteristics of a 5G network. The attack detection in 5G SDN involves Machine learning (ML) and Deep learning (DL) algorithms to analyze large volumes of network data and identify patterns indicative of attacks. The study's main objective is to develop an efficient DL model to improve the detection performance and respond to security breaches effectively in a 5G SDN environment. The DL model integrates the Particle Swarm Optimizer-Gated Recurrent Unit Layer-Generative Adversarial Network-Intrusion Detection System classifier (PSO-GRUGAN-IDS). The PSO optimizes the network weight of the GAN model to improve the backpropagation while generating the synthetic data (attack data) in the generator model using GRU. The discriminator model uses the PSO-optimized generator model to produce synthetic and real attack data to forecast the attack. Finally, a deep classification (IDS) model is trained using a GRU network with a GAN model-produced attack data and real data to classify whether the SDN traffic is malicious or normal. Moreover, the performance of this model is evaluated using the InSDN dataset and compared with existing DL model-based intrusion detection approaches and the results demonstrate a significantly higher accuracy rate of 98.4%, precision rate of 98%, recall rate of 98.5%, less detection time of 2.464 s, lesser Log loss rate of 1.0 and more metrics instilling confidence in the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.