ArticleScientific reports2025
Nonlinearity of the magnetization characteristic of the magnetic core in calculation of current error and phase displacement values of inductive CTs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental evaluation and accuracy analysis of inductive current transformers under realistic nonlinear and harmonic-rich load conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Measurement System and Testing Procedure for Characterization of the Conversion Accuracy of Voltage-to-Voltage and Voltage-to-Current Integrating Circuits for Rogowski Coils.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analytical Investigation of Primary Waveform Distortion Effect on Magnetic Flux Density in the Magnetic Core of Inductive Current Transformer and Its Transformation Accuracy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explores the implications of employing a load exhibiting a power factor of 1 to test the transformation accuracy of an inductive current transformer with an apparent power below 5 VA. It offers an explanation of the change in current error and phase displacement correlates with the load power factor. The impact of the load power factor on the secondary winding on the accuracy of inductive CT is investigated in detail. The paper introduces a newly developed method that allows for the calculation of current error and phase displacement values for any power factor with consideration of the nonlinearity of the magnetization characteristic of the magnetic core. To ensure required accuracy of calculations of utmost significance is the potential RMS value modification of the magnetic core excitation voltage, which may further impact the transformation accuracy. Consequently, the operational conditions during the test are modified, and, owing to the nonlinearity of the magnetization characteristic of the magnetic core, the values of current error and phase displacement are also changed-not only due to a different load power factor connected to the secondary winding of the tested inductive current transformer. To maintain consistent operational conditions for a given secondary winding load power factor, the resistance connected to the secondary winding during the accuracy test with the power factor equal to 1 should be corrected. Moreover, the findings of this paper lead to the conclusion that evaluation of the transformation accuracy of inductive current transformer for both secondary winding load power factors is essential to ensure its reliable future operation in real conditions with the required accuracy class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.