ArticleScientific data2025
Tactile, Audio, and Visual Dataset During Bare Finger Interaction with Textured Surfaces.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cluster Haptic Texture Dataset: Haptic Texture Dataset with Varied Velocity-Direction Sliding Contacts.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A Psychophysical Dataset for Vibrotactile Augmented Perception.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A Tactile Cognitive Model Based on Correlated Texture Information Entropy and Multimodal Fusion Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Tactile, Audio, and Visual Dataset During Bare Finger Interaction with Textured Surfaces.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive multi-modal dataset capturing concurrent haptic, audio, and visual signals recorded from ten participants as they interacted with ten different textured surfaces using their bare fingers. The dataset includes stereoscopic images of the textures, and fingertip position, speed, applied load, emitted sound, and friction-induced vibrations, providing an unprecedented insight into the complex dynamics underlying human tactile perception. Our approach utilizes a human finger (while most previous studies relied on rigid sensorized probes), enabling the naturalistic acquisition of haptic data and addressing a significant gap in resources for studies of human tactile exploration, perceptual mechanisms, and artificial tactile perception. Additionally, fifteen participants completed a questionnaire to evaluate their subjective perception of the surfaces. Through carefully designed data collection protocols, encompassing both controlled and free exploration scenarios, this dataset offers a rich resource for studying human multi-sensory integration and supports the development of algorithms for texture recognition based on multi-modal inputs. A preliminary analysis demonstrates the dataset's potential, as classifiers trained on different combinations of data modalities show promising accuracy in surface identification, highlighting its value for advancing research in multi-sensory perception and the development of human-machine interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.