ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2025
Screening Positive for Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies Increases Frequency of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Alters Clinical Management.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes and Management of Pregnancies Screening Positive for Microdeletions 22q11.2, 15q11.2, 1p36, 4p, or 5p: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The application of clinical genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOutcomes in pregnancies with rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) are poorly characterized, with most studies having small sample sizes. Here, we describe outcomes and management in a large cohort of pregnancies that screened positive for an RAA (RAA+).
methodsResults of prenatal cell-free DNA screening were linked to de-identified insurance claims data. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to estimate pregnancy outcomes and management. Relevant covariates in comparative analyses were adjusted using propensity-score matching. Outcomes were statistically compared using Mantel-Haenszel and McNemar's tests.
resultsAmong 682 RAA+ pregnancies, the rate of live birth was significantly lower (56.7% vs. 78.7%; p < 0.001), and the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were significantly higher (14.8% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001; 18.5% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.001; respectively), compared to pregnancies with RAA- results. In pregnancies that screened positive for a rare autosomal trisomy (RAT+) and in which the RAT+ results were known, ultrasounds (mean: 3.7 vs. 2.5, p = 0.002), and pregnancy-specific visits (mean: 6.6 vs. 5.1; p = 0.007) were more frequent compared with pregnancies in which the RAT+ result was unknown.
conclusionPregnancies with RAA+ results had higher rates of adverse outcomes compared with those with RAA- results, and awareness of RAA+ results was associated with more intensive monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.