ArticleMedical humanities2025
Alder Hey's heart of gold: charity, cardiac surgery and the distortion of paediatric provision in a nationalised health service, 1948-91.
Article in Medical humanities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Liverpool is perceived as exceptional, a city apart from the nation, and its health services are no different. Alder Hey, the city's children's hospital, reaffirms this perspective. Its name is inseparable from the scandal surrounding the unlawful removal and retention of thousands of organs, mostly hearts, from children for research purposes over decades culminating in the 2001 Redfern report. This paper contextualises these events by reconstructing how paediatric cardiac surgery, as an emerging subspecialty, disproportionately shaped the development of children's hospital services for the city and its region. Such cumulative, compounding impacts are invisible in the historiography, focused on national trends and high politics. Recognising but eschewing established policy narratives, the paper follows enduring tensions between teaching and research, service and specialty, centre and periphery, managers and clinicians and patients and professional prestige, which remained unresolved from the inception of the National Health Service (NHS) in 1948 to the Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital becoming a self-governing trust in 1991. Using archival documents to reconstruct complex organisational and clinical decision-making within the shifting architecture of the NHS at national, regional and local levels over time, this paper shows how children's hospital services in Liverpool were distorted by another heart. One of gold: charity. Public appeals and philanthropic support for paediatric provision outweighed competing claims for compassionate giving in Liverpool. The availability of alternative funding to develop highly specialised paediatric cardiac surgery, and to lever further statutory resources at the expense of competing specialties, impacted the shape of nationalised health services in the city and its wider region. Ultimately, the paper demonstrates how children's care, clinicians and charity confounded efforts to organise universal, nationalised health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.