Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40122560›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Theory-informed process evaluation protocol to assess a rapid-access outpatient model of care in South East Queensland, Australia.

Ashleigh Earnshaw, Hannah E Carter, Shannon Wallis, Steven M McPhail, Kelly McGowan, Sundresan Naicker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashleigh EarnshawAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2605-8481
Hannah E CarterAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-4126
Shannon WallisWest Moreton Hospital and Health Service, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.
Steven M McPhailAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kelly McGowanWest Moreton Hospital and Health Service, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.
Sundresan NaickerAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia sundresan.naicker@qut.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic diseases place a large burden on health systems globally. While long-term planned care is essential for their management, episodes of deterioration are common. The emergence of rapid access to outpatient care has proliferated in response to increased resource pressures on acute health services. It is anticipated that these new models of care may prevent hospitalisations and reduce the burden on emergency departments. While some evidence supports the clinical effectiveness of these models, little is known about the core components and key attributes of these services. This paper outlines the protocol of a theory-driven, pragmatic process evaluation embedded within a new rapid-access outpatient service for chronic disease in South East Queensland, Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted across three phases: (1) context assessment to identify programme characteristics and core components; (2) evaluation of key service processes and development of service improvement strategies and (3) sustainability assessment, with a focus on programme embedding and the resources associated with service evaluation. Each phase will be guided using implementation science frameworks and/or theory. Participants will include service consumers, service delivery staff, implementation leaders and decision-makers and wider system referrers. Professional stakeholders will be recruited through a direct invitation to participate (using purposeful sampling methods) and will be engaged in interviews at 1-3 data collection time points. Service consumers will be recruited through direct advertisement to participate in interviews. Administrative and clinical data collections will be retrospectively analysed with descriptive and inferential methods and triangulated with qualitative data to yield primary and secondary outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical clearance has been obtained from the West Moreton Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee. The planned dissemination of results will occur through conferences, abstracts and publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR Trial ID: ACTRN12624000757516).

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareHealth Services AccessibilityProcess Assessment, Health CareChronic DiseaseHumansProgram EvaluationQueenslandResearch DesignHealth ServicesImplementation ScienceMultimorbidity

Identifiers

PMID40122560
PMCPMC11934388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.