Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40122553›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Providing Enhanced Access to Child Health Services (PEACH) at Sydney Children's Hospital Network: a study protocol.

Karen Zwi, Safa Majidi, Jahidur Rahman Khan, Anna van Beek, Anna Kearns, Rezwanul Rana, Ashlie Nobilo, Barb Vernon, Michael Hodgins, Seaneen Wallace and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Karen ZwiSydney Children's Hospitals Network Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia karen.zwi@health.nsw.gov.au.
Safa MajidiSydney Children's Hospitals Network Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Jahidur Rahman KhanSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3029-6303
Anna van BeekSydney Children's Hospitals Network Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Anna KearnsSydney Children's Hospitals Network Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Rezwanul RanaMacquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ashlie NobiloSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Barb VernonWomen's & Children's Healthcare Australasia, Braddon, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Michael HodginsSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-3428
Seaneen WallaceDiversity Health, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Nan HuSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Raghu LingamSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChildren and young people (CYP) from priority populations in Australia have inequities in accessing healthcare, health outcomes and opportunities to lead healthy lives. Priority populations include CYP who are Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander, culturally and linguistically diverse (born in a country where English is not an official language and/or speak a language other than English at home), with experience of being a refugee or asylum seeker, living in out-of-home care or with a disability. Providing Enhanced Access to Child Health Services (PEACH) is an organisation-wide quality improvement project that aims to achieve equivalent health outcomes in CYP from priority populations compared with their non-priority population peers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PEACH creates an equity-focused learning health system using electronic medical record (eMR) patient data and qualitative methodology exploring staff and service user experiences. Five priority population advisory groups, consisting of staff and priority population service users, guide the research at the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (SCHN), Australia's largest tertiary paediatric health service. Interviews, surveys and co-design workshops with service users (CYP and/or their parent/carer) and staff describe existing health inequities and inform the design and implementation of interventions to improve identification, provision of earlier and supported access to services and effect cultural change. The impact of PEACH on reducing inequity in care and outcomes will be measured by comparing data during and after implementation (2020-2027) with baseline data before implementation (2015-2019) and with national controls, controlling for potential confounding factors. Health access and outcome measures, including emergency and preventable hospitalisations, critical care admission, discharge against medical advice, readmission and extended length of stay, will be analysed and drawn into dashboards, driving continuous learning and improvement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The SCHN Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH00145) and Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council (1920/22) have granted ethics approval. Research findings will be shared with service users, staff advisory groups and the wider children's healthcare sector through presentations, conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services, IndigenousHospitals, PediatricAdolescentAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolHumansQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementResearch DesignHealthHealth EquityHealth ServicesPAEDIATRICS

Identifiers

PMID40122553
PMCPMC11931900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.