Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40122536›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Global, regional and national burden and quality of care index (QCI) of leukaemia and brain and central nervous system tumours in children and adolescents aged 0-19 years: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2019.

Yanxin Bi, Kepei Huang, Minmin Wang, Yinzi Jin, Zhi-Jie Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Epidemiology of brain and central nervous system cancers in children and adolescents.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanxin BiDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3146-274X
Kepei HuangDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Minmin WangDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China yzjin@bjmu.edu.cn minmin_wang@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3213-2481
Yinzi JinDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China yzjin@bjmu.edu.cn minmin_wang@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0634-3955
Zhi-Jie ZhengDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the global, regional and national disparities in the quality of care for leukaemia and brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumours among children and adolescents aged 0-19 years. We also assessed temporal trends in the quality of care index (QCI) and explored associations with sociodemographic development levels, gender and age.

settingThe study used data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 database, covering 204 countries and territories. The analysis included global, regional and national levels of care, stratified by sociodemographic index (SDI), gender and age groups.

participantsThe study included children and adolescents aged 0-19 years diagnosed with leukaemia or CNS tumours. Data on incidence, prevalence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were extracted from the GBD 2019 database. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the QCI, constructed using principal component analysis from four secondary indicators: years of life lost to years lived with disability ratio, DALYs to prevalence ratio, mortality to incidence ratio and prevalence to incidence ratio. Secondary outcomes included temporal trends in QCI, gender disparity ratios (GDRs) and correlations between QCI and SDI levels.

resultsIn 2019, leukaemia and CNS tumours accounted for 132 194 deaths globally. The QCI for leukaemia was 74.71, while for CNS tumours, it was 56.59. From 1990 to 2019, the QCI for CNS tumours increased significantly (estimated annual percentage change (EAPC)=1.45, 95% CI: 1.41 to 1.50), whereas the QCI for leukaemia showed a declining trend in middle and low-middle SDI regions (EAPC=-0.13, 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.09). Western Europe had the highest QCI for leukaemia (94.50), while South Asia had the lowest (57.64). Boys had lower QCI scores than girls, and the gender disparity in CNS tumours widened over time (GDR increased from 1.147 in 1990 to 1.160 in 2019). QCI was positively correlated with SDI levels (leukaemia: r=0.591, p<0.001; CNS tumours: r=0.812, p<0.001).

conclusionsThis study highlights significant disparities in the quality of childhood cancer care across regions, development levels and genders. While global QCI for CNS tumours improved, leukaemia care quality declined in middle and low-middle SDI regions. Boys and populations in low SDI regions are particularly vulnerable to poor care. Policymakers should prioritise targeted interventions to address these disparities, improve access to quality care and reduce the global burden of childhood cancer.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsHealthcare DisparitiesLeukemiaQuality of Health CareAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornChildHealth EquityLeukaemiaONCOLOGYPaediatric oncology

Identifiers

PMID40122536
PMCPMC11931942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.