Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40122034›Full record

Trial reportPsychotherapy and psychosomatics2025

Telephone-Guided Sleep Restriction for Insomnia: A Randomized Sleep Diary-Controlled Trial.

Mathilde I Looman, Tessa F Blanken, Tim M Schoenmakers, Joyce E Reesen, Marieke Effting, Floris E Linnebank, Annemieke van Straten, Jan H Kamphuis, Jaap Lancee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05548907 (Sleep Restriction Treatment for Insomnia), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05548907 nacompletednot on this map

Sleep Restriction Treatment for Insomnia: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVU University of AmsterdamRan2022 to 2023Enrolled148ConditionsInsomniaArmssleep restriction treatment, sleep diary monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. From night-to-night and from person-to-person: dynamic phenomena of insomnia.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Novel psychotherapies for insomnia.Journal of sleep research · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mathilde I LoomanDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa F BlankenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tim M SchoenmakersDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joyce E ReesenDepartment of Sleep and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marieke EfftingDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Floris E LinnebankDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annemieke van StratenAmsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan H KamphuisDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap LanceeDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInsomnia is common, but access to its first-line treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), is limited. To explore a scalable alternative, we investigated the efficacy of sleep restriction therapy (SRT), a core component of CBT-I, delivered via telephone.

methodsIn a randomized controlled trial, 147 adults with insomnia were allocated to 6 weeks of telephone-guided SRT (n = 76) or a sleep diary control group (n = 71). The SRT group received weekly supporting phone calls lasting 10-15 min. At baseline and posttest, we measured insomnia severity (primary outcome), sleep diary measures, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, presleep arousal, sleep-safety behaviors, daytime sleepiness, and dysfunctional sleep-related cognitions (secondary outcomes). The SRT group repeated these measures at 3- and 6-month follow-ups.

resultsTelephone-guided SRT showed large between-group effects on insomnia severity at posttest relative to the sleep diary control group (d = 1.52; p < 0.001). Based on intention-to-treat, 36 (47%) participants randomized to SRT achieved clinical improvement, and 23 (30%) achieved insomnia remission. We found medium-to-large between-group effects at posttest (d = 0.53-1.18) for all secondary outcomes except daytime sleepiness and total sleep time. At 3- and 6-month follow-ups, the primary and all secondary outcomes, including daytime sleepiness and total sleep time, improved relative to baseline within the SRT group (d = 0.50-1.93).

conclusionThis trial shows that telephone-guided SRT is an effective insomnia treatment requiring minimal therapist guidance. If direct comparisons with CBT-I corroborate these findings, SRT could be an interesting scalable alternative to CBT-I as a first-line insomnia treatment. TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT05548907.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapySleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersTelephoneAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicineTreatment OutcomeInsomniaRandomized controlled trialSleep restriction therapyTelephone-guided

Identifiers

PMID40122034
PMCPMC12060811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.