Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40121945›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2025

Comprehensive mapping elucidates high risk genotypes in primary metastatic breast cancer.

Tobias Berg, Lise Ahlborn, Maj-Britt Jensen, Ann Søegaard Knoop, Bent Ejlertsen, Maria Rossing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tobias BergDanish Breast Cancer Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: tobias.berg.01@regionh.dk.
Lise AhlbornCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maj-Britt JensenDanish Breast Cancer Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann Søegaard KnoopDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bent EjlertsenDanish Breast Cancer Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria RossingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among women with primary metastatic breast cancer (pMBC), around 5 % of women with primary invasive breast cancer, high-risk mutations associated with disease progression and poor prognosis is shown. The heterogeneity and clinical implications of these genomic alterations remains to be fully elucidated. We performed comprehensive gene mapping on 211 tumors of women diagnosed with pMBC at Rigshospitalet 2014-2021. After DNA purification 203 tumor samples were eligible for analysis. Median age in our cohort was 69 years, 68 % were ER-positive/HER2-negative, 23 % HER2-positive and 9 % triple-negative. A high tumor mutational burden (TMB), shown in 10 %, was in univariable analysis associated with a poor prognosis and a median overall survival of 5.3 months (95 % CI, 2.5-51.3) but no significant association after adjusting for subtype and age. 65 % of tumors had an actionable biomarker, including a PIK3CA mutation in 39 %. TP53 mutations were found in 33 % of tumors and were associated with an increased risk of death (adjusted HR: 1.60, 95 % CI; 1.07-2.40). We have found that for women with pMBC, the disease is driven by several targetable genetic mutations across subtypes, however our results suggest a reduced prognostic value of TMB for this complex patient group. Taken together, our findings substantiate the value of early genomic profiling to actively identify women that may be eligible for a more individualized treatment scheme.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanBreast cancerGenomicsMetastatic

Identifiers

PMID40121945
PMCPMC11981775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.