ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2025
Comprehensive mapping elucidates high risk genotypes in primary metastatic breast cancer.
Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-Cell mRNA Analysis for the Identification of Molecular Pathways of IRF1 in HER2+ Breast Cancer.Cells · 2025Article
- IBCar: Potent Orally Bioavailable MethylCancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among women with primary metastatic breast cancer (pMBC), around 5 % of women with primary invasive breast cancer, high-risk mutations associated with disease progression and poor prognosis is shown. The heterogeneity and clinical implications of these genomic alterations remains to be fully elucidated. We performed comprehensive gene mapping on 211 tumors of women diagnosed with pMBC at Rigshospitalet 2014-2021. After DNA purification 203 tumor samples were eligible for analysis. Median age in our cohort was 69 years, 68 % were ER-positive/HER2-negative, 23 % HER2-positive and 9 % triple-negative. A high tumor mutational burden (TMB), shown in 10 %, was in univariable analysis associated with a poor prognosis and a median overall survival of 5.3 months (95 % CI, 2.5-51.3) but no significant association after adjusting for subtype and age. 65 % of tumors had an actionable biomarker, including a PIK3CA mutation in 39 %. TP53 mutations were found in 33 % of tumors and were associated with an increased risk of death (adjusted HR: 1.60, 95 % CI; 1.07-2.40). We have found that for women with pMBC, the disease is driven by several targetable genetic mutations across subtypes, however our results suggest a reduced prognostic value of TMB for this complex patient group. Taken together, our findings substantiate the value of early genomic profiling to actively identify women that may be eligible for a more individualized treatment scheme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.