ArticleCancer genetics2025
Genetic testing referral and germline pathogenic variants in patients with breast cancer and another non-breast cancer.
Article in Cancer genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines recommend germline genetic testing for specific combinations of primary cancers and ages of diagnoses, but do not recommend testing for all patients with multiple primary cancers (MPC). Patients with breast cancer are more likely to receive genetic testing. Here, we evaluated whether a first breast cancer was more likely than another first cancer type to prompt testing referral.
methodsUsing Oncoshare, a breast cancer research database of medical records and the California Cancer Registry, we identified female patients with MPC diagnosed January 2000-June 2023 with breast cancer as either the first or second cancer and seen at Stanford Health Care. We analyzed genetic testing rates after first versus second cancer diagnosis and the yield of pathogenic variants (PV). We evaluated the association between the receipt of genetic testing and timing of breast cancer (1st or 2nd), using univariate and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age at first diagnosis, race/ethnicity, and time between first and second diagnoses.
results1,069 patients met eligibility criteria; 75 % were non-Hispanic white, and 73 % had breast as the first cancer. 342 (32 %) patients had testing, of which 113 (33 %) had at least one PV. Patients with first breast cancer had a trend toward higher testing rate, (OR 1.62, 95 % CI 0.9-3.0), p = 0.11.
conclusionUsing a breast cancer research database, MPC patients showed a trend toward being more likely to receive genetic testing when breast cancer preceded another cancer. High yield for a germline pathogenic variant suggests that all MPC patients should have cancer genetics risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.