Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40121845›Full record

ArticleCancer genetics2025

Genetic testing referral and germline pathogenic variants in patients with breast cancer and another non-breast cancer.

Rachel Hodan, Victor Ritter, Summer Han, Shilpa Narayan, Mina Satoyoshi, Allison W Kurian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel HodanDepartment of Pediatrics (Genetics), Stanford University School of Medicine, United States; Cancer Genetics, Stanford Health Care, United States. Electronic address: rhodan@stanfordhealthcare.org.
Victor RitterQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States.
Summer HanQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States.
Shilpa NarayanCancer Genetics, Stanford Health Care, United States.
Mina SatoyoshiStanford Technology & Digital Solutions/Research Technology/Data Services, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States.
Allison W KurianDepartments of Medicine and of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States.

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL KENNEY · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032INCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines recommend germline genetic testing for specific combinations of primary cancers and ages of diagnoses, but do not recommend testing for all patients with multiple primary cancers (MPC). Patients with breast cancer are more likely to receive genetic testing. Here, we evaluated whether a first breast cancer was more likely than another first cancer type to prompt testing referral.

methodsUsing Oncoshare, a breast cancer research database of medical records and the California Cancer Registry, we identified female patients with MPC diagnosed January 2000-June 2023 with breast cancer as either the first or second cancer and seen at Stanford Health Care. We analyzed genetic testing rates after first versus second cancer diagnosis and the yield of pathogenic variants (PV). We evaluated the association between the receipt of genetic testing and timing of breast cancer (1st or 2nd), using univariate and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age at first diagnosis, race/ethnicity, and time between first and second diagnoses.

results1,069 patients met eligibility criteria; 75 % were non-Hispanic white, and 73 % had breast as the first cancer. 342 (32 %) patients had testing, of which 113 (33 %) had at least one PV. Patients with first breast cancer had a trend toward higher testing rate, (OR 1.62, 95 % CI 0.9-3.0), p = 0.11.

conclusionUsing a breast cancer research database, MPC patients showed a trend toward being more likely to receive genetic testing when breast cancer preceded another cancer. High yield for a germline pathogenic variant suggests that all MPC patients should have cancer genetics risk assessment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedGenetics referralsGermline testingMultiple primary cancersPathogenic variants

Identifiers

PMID40121845
PMCPMC12306642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.