SynthesisMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025
A comparison of piezoelectric surgery and conventional techniques in the enucleation of cysts and tumors in the jaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of piezoelectric surgery versus conventional methods for benign odontogenic jaw cysts tumours.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Management of a Mandibular Odontogenic Keratocyst with Enucleation, Piezotome-Assisted Peripheral Ostectomy, and Platelet-Rich Fibrin-A Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the comprehensive classifications provided by the WHO, the most common lesions include radicular cysts, dentigerous cysts, odontogenic keratocysts, ameloblastomas, and odontomas. The piezoelectric technique has shown effectiveness in removing intraosseous pathologies by relying on ultrasonic microvibrations, which help preserve soft and vascular tissues. Precision in manipulating intraosseous pathology can impact the prognosis and improve the surgical procedure by controlling hemorrhage and promoting microscopic benefits. While previous research has compared the advantages of piezoelectric surgery and rotational methods, a systematic review is needed to consolidate the available information on this specific clinical issue. MATERIAL AND
methodsA search strategy was developed with de PRISMA statement. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase electronic databases were searched. The bibliographic search was conducted in December 2023. The methodological quality of the studies followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical evaluation tool for randomized clinical trials.
resultsThe final sample comprised 5 clinical trials, involving 231 cysts and 120 tumors in the experimental group. The mean age of participants was 30.6 years, with 196 men and 141 women included in the study. However, conventional surgery is faster than piezosurgery, both techniques exhibited similarities in epithelial perforation, soft tissue damage, edema, postoperative infections, and occurrences of paresthesia. Regarding recurrence, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two techniques (p-value=0.339; 95% confidence interval, -0.093-0.270).
conclusionsThe surgical removal of benign odontogenic cysts and tumors in the jaws using piezosurgery yielded slight intraoperative and postoperative advantages compared to conventional rotary surgery, except for the duration of surgical procedures. It shows reduced intraoperative hemorrhage and postoperative pain but similar outcomes in other variables. The results should be interpreted with caution, more studies are needed to obtain a more robust result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.