ArticleMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025
Assessing nerve injuries in oral surgery: a survey-based study on prevention and management.
Article in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-functional DHBA/Zn-hybrid electrospun scaffolds for simultaneous nerve repair and bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding and mitigating iatrogenic nerve injuries, specifically IAN and LN, is crucial in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. These injuries may lead to profound sensory deficits, pain syndromes, and impaired quality of life for patients. This study aims to assess the prevention and management practices for inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve injuries among dental professionals. By gathering data through a survey, the study seeks to evaluate current experiences, awareness, and protocols, ultimately contributing to improved guidelines for nerve injury management. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study utilized an online survey distributed via Turkish Dental Association to registered dentists and specialists. The predictor variables were the procedure types associated with nerve injuries. The main outcome variables were preventive measures and patient management strategies. Demographic profiling including age, years in profession, specialty, and type of current workplace were determined as covariates.
results1477 respondents provided complete answers, with questions addressing demographics, nerve injury incidents, preventive measures, and management strategies. The most reported IAN and LN injuries were linked to dental implant surgery (n=1067), mandibular third molar surgery (n=958), and local anesthesia applications (n=459). Interestingly, more than 30% of participants reported no experience with nerve injuries. For preventive measures in tooth extraction, 281 respondents performed coronectomies, and in implant surgery over 80% of the participants evaluated tomographic images in high-risk cases. Most common management strategies for paresthesia included vitamin B12 (n=1093) and NSAIDs (n=1051). The use of gabapentin, and non-medical treatments like biofeedback and alternative therapies were rarely employed.
conclusionsThe survey revealed a diverse range of practices regarding nerve injury prevention and management, emphasizing the need for evidence-based approaches and consensus guidelines. Understanding current practices for managing IAN and LN injuries can inform future guidelines, reduce complications, and improve patient outcomes in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.