SynthesisMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025
Efficacy of platelet-rich-fibrin for the treatment of alveolar osteitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Clinical Practices and Attitudes of Dental Practitioners in Managing Alveolar Osteitis: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Yemen.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis systematic review aims to provide an updated summary of the available evidence on the role of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in the treatment of alveolar osteitis. MATERIAL AND
methodsSearches were conducted in several electronic databases, including PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) LILACS and ClinicalTrials.gov. No date or language restrictions were applied. Two reviewers independently evaluated eligible studies according to predefined criteria and extracted data using a standardized form. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate results and the certainty of evidence, using the GRADE approach, was assessed.
resultsThe search strategy yielded 1.706 references. Finally, 4 randomized trials were included and assessed quantitatively. Overall, the risk of bias was low for 75% of the domains reviewed across studies. The studies included a total of 179 patients, where the intervention group received PRF, and the control group received several treatment alternatives, including iodoform gauze, zinc oxide eugenol, and saline solution. Results showed that the use of PRF may decrease pain severity measured on day 3 (MD -1.66, CI 95%, -4.11 to 0.78) and on day 7 (MD -1.57, CI 95%, -4.00 to 0.88), and improves alveolar socket healing (SMD 2.25; 95% CI 1.70 to 2.80; p<0.00001; I2=12%).
conclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate that PRF improves alveolar healing, reduces analgesic use in patients, and likely increases overall clinical efficacy, making it a valuable alternative in the treatment of alveolar osteitis. Despite these findings, this review also showed a great degree of uncertainty on the impact of PRF on pain severity associated with alveolar osteitis. Although these results are promising, further randomized clinical trials with standardized methodologies must be performed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.