ReviewThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2025
Beyond a few bases: methods for large DNA insertion and gene targeting in plants.
Review in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From gametocides to gene drive: natural transmission distortion systems as tools for cereal breeding.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Engineering hypercompact IscB nucleases for efficient and versatile genome editing in rice.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Modification of starch synthesis in food crops using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology for changing climate.Stress biology · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Cas technologies for precision genome editing in plants: advances, applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Research progress and applications of gene activation editing technology in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Advances and prospects of large DNA fragment editing in plants.Nature plants · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas have greatly accelerated the pace of both fundamental research and translational applications in agriculture. However, many plant biologists are functionally limited to creating small, targeted DNA changes or large, random DNA insertions. The ability to efficiently generate large, yet precise, DNA changes will massively accelerate crop breeding cycles, enabling researchers to more efficiently engineer crops amidst a rapidly changing agricultural landscape. This review provides an overview of existing technologies that allow plant biologists to integrate large DNA sequences within a plant host and some associated technical bottlenecks. Additionally, this review explores a selection of emerging techniques in other host systems to inspire tool development in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.