ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Specific types of anxiety regarding radiation therapy in patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe radiotherapy categorical anxiety scale (RCAS) was designed to evaluate the specific types of radiation therapy (RT)-related anxiety in cancer patients. We translated RCAS into Chinese, evaluated its reliability and validity in breast cancer (BC) patients, and used it to evaluate changes in specific types and levels of RT-related anxiety throughout RT.
methodsThis was a prospective, longitudinal study enrolling 504 Chinese BC patients receiving RT. The patients completed questionnaires assessing the specific types of RT-related anxiety (our Chinese version of RCAS), depression [Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)], and anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)] before, during, and after RT. Emotional distress (ED) was defined as a PHQ-9 or GAD-7 score of > 4. Generalized estimating equation was performed to evaluate changes in total and subscale scores on RCAS. Multivariable general linear models were used to explore independent predictors of baseline RCAS scores.
resultsOur Chinese version of RCAS demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89-0.92). Our data demonstrated a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of 0.946 and P < 0.001 on the Bartlett sphericity test, indicating their suitability for subsequent confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA further demonstrated its adequate convergent and discriminant validity. The levels of anxiety related to RT environment decreased over time, whereas those of anxiety related to RT treatment efficacy remained stable throughout the treatment. Patients demonstrated higher scores on items regarding side effects and treatment efficacy of RT than on other items. ED before RT independently predicted for higher baseline RCAS score.
conclusionsOur Chinese version of the RCAS can be used to quantitatively evaluate specific types of RT-related anxiety in Chinese BC patients. Clinicians should pay more attention to anxiety regarding the side effects and treatment efficacy of RT reported by their patients, particularly those with baseline ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40121597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.