ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Magnetic resonance imaging for suspected perianal Crohn's disease in children: a multi-reader agreement study.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to assess inter-radiologist agreement when interpreting pelvic MRI in children with newly diagnosed perianal Crohn's disease (CD). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective multi-reader study, we identified pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) who underwent a pelvic MRI examination for newly diagnosed perianal CD. Images were de-identified and uploaded to a cloud-based image platform for review by 13 fellowship-trained pediatric radiologists The reviewers assessed for the presence of a fistula and abscess, categorization of different imaging findings, and classification using the Parks and St James' University Hospital systems. Fleiss' kappa (κ) statistics and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to measure inter-reader agreement, along with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsForty-six patients were included in our study (median age = 13.0 years [IQR: 10.5 to 16.0 years]); thirty-five (76.1%) were boys. Most imaging features showed fair agreement (κ = 0.21 to 0.35). There was moderate agreement for categorical fistula length (κ = 0.42 [95% CI: 0.32 to 0.53]), involvement of the genitalia (κ = 0.45 [95% CI: 0.26 to 0.63]), and presence of an abscess/collection (κ = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.31 to 0.73]). Maximum abscess/collection length had good agreement (ICC = 0.81 [95% CI: 0.41, 1.00]). There was an almost equal split (yes vs. no: 50.7% vs. 49.3%) regarding whether postcontrast T1-weighted images added value compared to T2-weighted images alone across all radiologists and examinations.
conclusionInter-radiologist agreement when interpreting pelvic MRI for perianal CD in children is fair for most imaging features, with fewer features demonstrating moderate or good agreement. KEY POINTS: Question Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for diagnosing and monitoring children with perianal Crohn's disease (CD). Limited information is known about inter-radiologist agreement. Findings Agreement between pediatric radiologists when interpreting MRI for perianal CD in children is only fair for most imaging features (κ = 0.21 to 0.35). Clinical relevance Understanding MRI inter-radiologist agreement is crucial to improve the reliability of pelvic MRI in children with perianal Crohn's disease since it may affect patient management (e.g., surgery); further radiologist education and improved imaging feature definitions may help improve inter-radiologist agreement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.