ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2025
Standardizing free-text data exemplified by two fields from the Immune Epitope Database.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile unstructured data, such as free text, constitutes a large amount of publicly available biomedical data, it is underutilized in automated analyses due to the difficulty of extracting meaning from it. Normalizing free-text data, i.e., removing inessential variance, enables the use of structured vocabularies like ontologies to represent the data and allow for harmonized queries over it. This paper presents an adaptable tool for free-text normalization and an evaluation of the application of this tool to two different fields curated from the literature in the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB): "age" and "data-location" (the part of a paper in which data was found).
resultsFree text entries for the database fields for subject age (4095 distinct values) and publication data-location (251,810 distinct values) in the IEDB were analyzed. Normalization was performed in three steps, namely character normalization, word normalization, and phrase normalization, using generalizable rules developed and applied with the tool presented in this manuscript. For the age dataset, in the character stage, the application of 21 rules resulted in 99.97% output validity; in the word stage, the application of 94 rules resulted in 98.06% output validity; and in the phrase stage, the application of 16 rules resulted in 83.81% output validity. For the data-location dataset, in the character stage, the application of 39 rules resulted in 99.99% output validity; in the word stage, the application of 187 rules resulted in 98.46% output validity; and in the phrase stage, the application of 12 rules resulted in 97.95% output validity.
conclusionsWe developed a generalizable approach for normalization of free text as found in database fields with content on a specific topic. Creating and testing the rules took a one-time effort for a given field that can now be applied to data as it is being curated. The standardization achieved in two datasets tested produces significantly reduced variance in the content which enhances the findability and usability of that data, chiefly by improving search functionality and enabling linkages with formal ontologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.