ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Towards a standard benchmark for phenotype-driven variant and gene prioritisation algorithms: PhEval - Phenotypic inference Evaluation framework.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic benchmarking demonstrates large language models have not reached the diagnostic accuracy of traditional rare-disease decision support tools.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- RareLink: scalable REDCap-based framework for rare disease interoperability linking international registries to FHIR and Phenopackets.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Consistent performance of large language models in rare disease diagnosis across ten languages and 4917 cases.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Linking international registries to FHIR and Phenopackets with RareLink: a scalable REDCap-based framework for rare disease data interoperability.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Consistent Performance of GPT-4o in Rare Disease Diagnosis Across Nine Languages and 4967 Cases.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Population health management through human phenotype ontology with policy for ecosystem improvement.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- The Unified Phenotype Ontology (uPheno): A framework for cross-species integrative phenomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComputational approaches to support rare disease diagnosis are challenging to build, requiring the integration of complex data types such as ontologies, gene-to-phenotype associations, and cross-species data into variant and gene prioritisation algorithms (VGPAs). However, the performance of VGPAs has been difficult to measure and is impacted by many factors, for example, ontology structure, annotation completeness or changes to the underlying algorithm. Assertions of the capabilities of VGPAs are often not reproducible, in part because there is no standardised, empirical framework and openly available patient data to assess the efficacy of VGPAs-ultimately hindering the development of effective prioritisation tools.
resultsIn this paper, we present our benchmarking tool, PhEval, which aims to provide a standardised and empirical framework to evaluate phenotype-driven VGPAs. The inclusion of standardised test corpora and test corpus generation tools in the PhEval suite of tools allows open benchmarking and comparison of methods on standardised data sets.
conclusionsPhEval and the standardised test corpora solve the issues of patient data availability and experimental tooling configuration when benchmarking and comparing rare disease VGPAs. By providing standardised data on patient cohorts from real-world case-reports and controlling the configuration of evaluated VGPAs, PhEval enables transparent, portable, comparable and reproducible benchmarking of VGPAs. As these tools are often a key component of many rare disease diagnostic pipelines, a thorough and standardised method of assessment is essential for improving patient diagnosis and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.