ArticleBMC primary care2025
A qualitative RE-AIM evaluation of an embedded community paramedicine program in an Ontario Family Health Team.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Community Paramedics in Australia: A Case Study Adapting the Canadian Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) Program in Rural Australia, Using an Implementation Science Approach.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 2014, a rural Family Health Team (FHT) in Ontario, Canada embedded a community paramedicine program into their primary care practice to improve care for their complex patients. Community paramedics are health care professionals who extend their role beyond emergency services to provide primary care in home and community settings. The study aims to evaluate the utility of having community paramedics embedded in a rural FHT.
methodsIn this qualitative study, we conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with the community paramedicine team (n=4) and other staff from the FHT (n=8), including physicians, nurse practitioners, allied health professionals (AHPs), and the program director. We conducted a deductive and thematic analysis using the RE-AIM framework. This allowed us to examine the strengths and challenges of incorporating community paramedics in a primary care model for providers and coordinating patient care in a rural setting.
resultsReach: The community paramedicine program is primarily used by physicians to target older patients with multiple chronic conditions, frequent health care use, and limited social support. EFFECTIVENESS: In-home visits by community paramedics yield a detailed picture of patients' health-related behaviours, such as medication adherence and dietary habits, improving the FHT's understanding of patient needs and informing care strategies. Adoption: Community paramedics value the opportunity to build long-lasting patient relationships. IMPLEMENTATION: The FHT's rural location is a significant external barrier limiting the paramedic program's ability to serve a larger patient caseload. Maintenance: The program aligns with the FHT's mission to improve access to care for vulnerable patients.
conclusionsOur findings highlight community paramedics' role in supporting high-needs patients, particularly in rural settings. The average age of patients in the program is 78, and they often have multiple comorbidities, including prevalent dementia. Such health conditions necessitate home visits to gather accurate health information often masked in clinic settings. Embedding community paramedics in a primary care model improves access to care and provides more support for patients with complex needs. Using these findings, we developed a "how to" blueprint for embedding community paramedics in primary care settings to address the care needs of high-risk older adults. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.