Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2025
Clinical utility of the FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis panel in children with suspected central nervous system infection in a low-resource setting - a prospective study in Southwestern Uganda.
Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03900091 (Paediatric Infections Point-Of-Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Paediatric Infections Point-Of-Care: Point-of-care Approach for Rapid and Easy Meningitis Diagnosis
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of a multiplex respiratory PCR panel on antibiotic stewardship in hospitalized pediatric pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Antibiotic stewardship and point-of-care testing for children in 25 low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Pathogen profiles in CSF from patients with acute infectious meningitis or encephalitis: a multicenter study based on multiplex PCR and mNGS in China, 2018-2019.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn low-resource settings, limited laboratory capacity adds to the burden of central nervous system (CNS) infections in children and spurs overuse of antibiotics. The commercially available BioFire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (FA-ME) with its capability to simultaneously detect 14 pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), could potentially narrow such a diagnostic gap.
methodsIn Mbarara, Uganda, we compared clinical utility (clinical turnaround time [cTAT], microbial yield, and influence on patient outcome and antibiotic exposure) of FA-ME with bacterial culture, in children 0-12 years with suspected CNS infection.
resultsOf 212 enrolled children, CSF was sampled from 194. All samples underwent bacterial culture, of which 193 also underwent FA-ME analyses. FA-ME analyses prospectively influenced care for 169 of the 193 patients, and they constituted an 'Index group'. The remaining 43/212 patients constituted a 'Reference group'. Of all 194 CSF-sampled patients, 87% (168) had received antibiotics before lumbar puncture. Median cTAT for FA-ME was 4.2 h, vs. two days for culture. Bacterial yield was 12% (24/193) and 1.5% (3/194) for FA-ME and culture, respectively. FA-ME viral yield was 12% (23/193). Fatality rate was 14% in the Index group vs. 19% in the Reference group (P = 0.20). From clinician receival of FA-ME results, median antibiotic exposure was 6 days for bacteria-negative vs. 13 days for bacteria-positive patients (P = 0.03). Median hospitalization duration was 7 vs. 12 days for FA-ME negative and positive patients, respectively (P < 0.01).
conclusionsIn this setting, clinical FA-ME utility was found in a higher and faster microbial yield and shortened hospitalization and antibiotic exposure of patients without CSF pathology. More epidemiologically customized pathogen panels may increase FA-ME utility locally, although its use in similar settings would require major cost reductions.
trial registrationThe trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03900091) in March 2019, and its protocol was published in November 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.