Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40121437›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2025

Drug testing after use: what insights can be gained from a harm reduction perspective on visitors of the drugs information and monitoring system (DIMS) in the Netherlands?

Stefania Schiavone, Nadia Robert Petronella Wilhelmina Hutten, Maria Bove, Maria Grazia Morgese, Luigia Trabace, Laura Alexandra Smit-Rigter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefania Schiavone *Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Nadia Robert Petronella Wilhelmina Hutten *Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maria BoveDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Maria Grazia MorgeseDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Luigia TrabaceDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Laura Alexandra Smit-RigterTrimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands. lsmit-rigter@trimbos.nl.

Funding

Dutch Ministry of Health Welfare and Sports NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions aimed to mitigate drug-related harm include drug checking, which invloves a chemical analysis of a drug sample alongside personalized harm reduction advise. The Drug Information and Monitoring System (DIMS) represents a network of Drug Checking Services (DCS) in the Netherlands, which people who use drugs (PWUD) may visit before consumption, though not consistently. This paper describes the characteristics and experienced effects of PWUD who have their drugs tested after use, in relation to the analysis results of the submitted drug sample and the setting of use.

methodsData was collected between 2018 until 2022 encompassing a range of characteristics provided by the visitors. Statistical analyses were performed to find associations between the type of effects the visitor experienced and the (mis)match with the expected content of the drug sample or setting in which the sample was used.

results14% (N = 9472) of all samples submitted to DIMS (N = 66150) were used prior to attending a DCS. The majority of samples were sold as ecstasy (41%, N = 3460) and cocaine (17%, N = 1407). Most visitors were male (75%, N = 6359), purchased their drugs offline (96%, N = 8081), and reported having used the sample at a party/festival (43%, N = 3614), while 27% (N = 2320) used it in a home setting. Half of the visitors (49%, N = 4109) declared not having used the sample in combination with other psychoactive substances. Positive mental effects were less likely to be experienced when the detected drug content did not match the expected content, while negative mental effects were more likely. Moreover, visitors consuming their sample at a party/festival were more likely to experience positive mental and physical effects and less likely to experience negative mental and physical effects compared to people consuming their sample at home.

conclusionsBy identifying the characteristics of PWUD who have their drugs tested after use and by demonstrating that not only a (mis)match with the expected drug content, but also the setting in which the substance was used was associated with the drug experience, improved strategies can be developed to encourage individuals to visit a DCS before consumption, thereby reducing drug-related harm.

Indexed as

Drug UsersHarm ReductionIllicit DrugsSubstance Abuse DetectionSubstance-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsYoung AdultIllicit DrugsDrug checking serviceDrug information and monitoring systemHarm reductionMental effectsPeople who use drugsPhysical effectsPreventive strategiesSetting

Identifiers

PMID40121437
PMCPMC11929261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.