ArticleBMC genomics2025
Multi-tool copy number detection highlights common body size-associated variants in miniature pig breeds from different geographical regions.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative multi-omics analysis of growth plate regulation underlying body size in miniature pigs.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Whole genome copy number variation analysis to detect genomic regions for resistance to Haemonchus contortus in Sheep.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Convergence and Parallelism of Phenotypic and Molecular Genetic Variability in Some Species.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCopy number variations (CNVs) represent a common and highly specific type of variation in the genome, potentially influencing genetic diversity and mammalian phenotypic development. Structural variants, such as deletions, duplications, and insertions, have frequently been highlighted as key factors influencing traits in high-production pigs. However, comprehensive CNV analyses in miniature pig breeds are limited despite their value in biomedical research.
resultsThis study performed whole-genome sequencing in 36 miniature pigs from nine breeds from America, Asia and Oceania, and Europe. By employing a multi-tool approach (CNVpytor, Delly, GATK gCNV, Smoove), the accuracy of CNV identification was improved. In total, 34 homozygous CNVs overlapped with exonic regions in all samples, suggesting a role in expressing specific phenotypes such as uniform growth patterns, fertility, or metabolic function. In addition, 386 copy number variation regions (CNVRs) shared by all breeds were detected, covering 33.6 Mb (1.48% of the autosomal genome). Further, 132 exclusive CNVRs were identified for American breeds, 47 for Asian and Oceanian breeds, and 114 for European breeds. Functional enrichment analysis revealed genes within the common CNVRs involved in body height determination and other growth-related parameters. Exclusive CNVRs were located in the region of genes enriched for lipid metabolism in American minipigs, reproductive traits in Asian and Oceanian breeds, and cardiovascular features and body height in European breeds. In the selected groups, quantitative trait loci associated with body size, meat quality, reproduction, and disease susceptibility were highlighted.
conclusionThis investigation of the CNV landscape of minipigs underlines the impact of selective breeding on structural variants and its role in the development of specific breed phenotypes across geographical areas. The multi-tool approach provides a valuable resource for future studies on the effects of artificial selection on livestock genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.