ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Still safe; still respectful: a mixed methods study exploring the early experiences of a rural community hospice in providing voluntary assisted dying.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVoluntary assisted dying has become available as an end-of-life choice in many countries, including Australia. There is evidence on the mixed impact of voluntary assisted dying legislation on palliative care healthcare professionals, however, less is known about the interface between palliative care and voluntary assisted dying in smaller rural settings. This study explored the experiences of staff at a hospice in rural Western Australia in the two years following the implementation of voluntary assisted dying legislation.
methodsA mixed-methods research methodology was used, with data collected via a brief anonymous survey and semi-structured interviews conducted with hospice staff in one rural location in Western Australia. Survey data was exported into SPSS and descriptive statistics were performed. Interviews were audio recorded and after deidentification, the transcripts were analysed thematically.
resultsA total of 30 participants took part in the survey and 10 were interviewed. The majority (n = 19) of survey respondents had been involved in voluntary assisted dying, yet only seven reported that their day-to-day role had changed. Supporting patient choice and autonomy were the most cited benefits of the introduction of voluntary assisted dying. Analysis of the qualitative data yielded three main themes: everyone is involved with patients accessing VAD; nothing changes but everything changes; and perceived support, education and training needs.
conclusionsThis study has described day-to-day work and experiences of those working in a small rural hospice which has integrated VAD into the care offered within the facility, observing there are subtle changes in the organisational atmosphere when VAD occurs. The education and support activities in place and the noted gaps may be a useful checklist for other hospices in the early phases of integrating VAD into their facility. Recommendations for future research are made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.