ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Patient satisfaction rates and tolerance of free-hand ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy in an outpatient setting.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient perspectives on ultrasound-guided interventions in respiratory medicine: an international, mixed-methods study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTransperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPPBx) under local anesthesia is becoming increasingly utilized due to its lower infection risk compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Despite its increasing utilization, patient experience with this procedure remains an area requiring further investigation. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction and tolerance of outpatient free-hand ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPBx), focusing on patient experiences during and after the procedure, and its impact on quality of life.
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted on 120 men undergoing TPPBx, using 2 standardized questionnaires; the day after the procedure and at follow-up 3-4 weeks later. Data on pain, post-procedural symptoms, and overall satisfaction were collected.
resultsOf the 120 participants, 97 completed both questionnaires (81% response rate). The mean age was 65 years, with a median of 66. Satisfaction with care was high, with 100% of patients satisfied and 89% willing to undergo the procedure again. Mean pain scores were as follows: probe insertion 3/10 (median 2, IQR 1-5), local anesthetic administration 3/10 (median 2, IQR 1-4), and biopsy sampling 2/10 (median 1, IQR 0-3). Post-procedural symptoms included hematuria (63%) and hematospermia (49%), with the latter distressing for 17% of patients. No infections or hospital admissions were reported.
conclusionTPPBx is a safe, effective, and tolerable method for prostate biopsy, with minimal complications and high satisfaction rates. Enhanced patient education and communication will be crucial as its adoption increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40121386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.