ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Improving residency programs in urology: status quo et quo vadis : Future perspectives].
Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [White paper: a future vision for cross-sector integrated urological care].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Well-founded and structured training in urology are the fundamental basis for high-quality, evidence-based, and personalized management of patients with significant diseases of the upper and lower urogenital tract. A major goal of residency programs in urology is the teaching of practical skills in interventional and conservative urology so that residents will be able to implement those skills independently as board certified urologists. Residency programs in Germany, however, are highly heterogeneous due to the fact that the specific contents are defined by state (Länder) medical associations. Furthermore, the implementation of the specific contents is the responsibility of the program directors, which is not assessed transparently. This inconsistency might explain the fact that about one third of residents are highly dissatisfied with the quality of their training programs. To meet future challenges due to the aging population and the already existing additional need of well-trained urologists, we need (1) to implement nationwide, structured, uniform, generally binding and transparent residency programs, (2) the teaching of communicative skills with patients and within interdisciplinary teams, and (3) work schedules that are flexible, including interdisciplinary education, regional and supraregional rotations. The current article summarizes the current landscape of urological training programs in Germany, discussing future perspectives for potential improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40121373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.