Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40121302›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

Vowel segmentation impact on machine learning classification for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Alper Idrisoglu, Ana Luiza Dallora Moraes, Abbas Cheddad, Peter Anderberg, Andreas Jakobsson, Johan Sanmartin Berglund

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06160674 (Vowel Segmentation for Classification of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Machine Learning), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06160674 active not recruitingnot on this map

Vowel Segmentation for Classification of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Machine Learning

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBlekinge Institute of TechnologyRan2023 to 2024Enrolled68ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsCOPD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alper IdrisogluDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 371 41, Karlskrona, Sweden. alper.idrisoglu@bth.se.
Ana Luiza Dallora MoraesDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 371 41, Karlskrona, Sweden.
Abbas CheddadDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 371 41, Karlskrona, Sweden.
Peter AnderbergDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 371 41, Karlskrona, Sweden.
Andreas JakobssonMathematical Statistic, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, SE, Sweden.
Johan Sanmartin BerglundDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 371 41, Karlskrona, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vowel-based voice analysis is gaining attention as a potential non-invasive tool for COPD classification, offering insights into phonatory function. The growing need for voice data has necessitated the adoption of various techniques, including segmentation, to augment existing datasets for training comprehensive Machine Learning (ML) modelsThis study aims to investigate the possible effects of segmentation of the utterance of vowel "a" on the performance of ML classifiers CatBoost (CB), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). This research involves training individual ML models using three distinct dataset constructions: full-sequence, segment-wise, and group-wise, derived from the utterance of the vowel "a" which consists of 1058 recordings belonging to 48 participants. This approach comprehensively analyzes how each data categorization impacts the model's performance and results. A nested cross-validation (nCV) approach was implemented with grid search for hyperparameter optimization. This rigorous methodology was employed to minimize overfitting risks and maximize model performance. Compared to the full-sequence dataset, the findings indicate that the second segment yielded higher results within the four-segment category. Specifically, the CB model achieved superior accuracy, attaining 97.8% and 84.6% on the validation and test sets, respectively. The same category for the CB model also demonstrated the best balance regarding true positive rate (TPR) and true negative rate (TNR), making it the most clinically effective choice. These findings suggest that time-sensitive properties in vowel production are important for COPD classification and that segmentation can aid in capturing these properties. Despite these promising results, the dataset size and demographic homogeneity limit generalizability, highlighting areas for future research.Trial registration The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov with ID: NCT06160674.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSupport Vector MachineVoiceChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)ClassificationMachine learningVowel segmentation

Identifiers

PMID40121302
PMCPMC11929820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.