ArticleScientific reports2025
Digital droplet PCR-based detection and quantification of ovine papillomavirus DNA from the vaginal virobiota of healthy mares.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of papillomavirus DNA in uterine flushing samples from healthy mares reveals diverse genotypes with differing host ranges.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bovine and ovine deltapapillomavirus coinfection associated with equine sarcoid.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are four genotypes of ovine papillomaviruses (OaPVs): OaPV1, OaPV2, and OaPV4, which are ovine delta papillomaviruses responsible for epithelial and mesenchymal cell infections, and OaPV3, an epitheliotropic Dyokappapapillomavirus associated with cutaneous tumors in sheep, including squamous cell carcinoma. Vaginal swabs of healthy mares were evaluated for the presence of PVs to investigate whether the vaginal virobiota of asymptomatic mares harbored OaPVs. High-performance digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was used to quantitatively detect OaPV types 1-4 DNA in 94 vaginal swabs collected at the National Reference Center for Veterinary and Comparative Oncology (CEROVEC), Genoa, Italy. All samples were comparatively evaluated for OaPV DNA loading using real-time quantitative PCR. ddPCR detected OaPV DNA in 25 vaginal swab samples (26.6%), whereas qPCR revealed 13 vaginal swabs (11.7%). Differences between the two molecular protocols were determined to be statistically significant using McNemar's test (p < 0.0005). The detected OaPV types were OaPV1 and OaPV3. Both methods failed to detect OaPV2 or OaPV4 DNA, which could be attributed to the limited number of samples examined. OaPV1 is the most prevalent OaPV in equine vaginal virobiota . This study is the first to provide evidence of the presence of OaPV DNA in vaginal swabs of healthy mares. This comparative detection approach underscores the superior sensitivity of ddPCR over qPCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.