ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatial prediction of wild boar distribution in Thailand applications for African swine fever prevention and control.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative epidemiology and preparedness for African swine fever and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in four major Asian swine industries.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
African swine fever (ASF) has spread to many Southeast Asian countries, affecting domestic pig farms and wild boars. This is especially prevalent in areas where human settlements, domestic animals, and wildlife intersect. Our study suggests using the Random Forest (RF) technique to predict the presence or absence of wild boars and estimate their population density in a specified area. We suggest using data from the Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool (SMART) to estimate the wild boar population in Southeast Asian countries, particularly in mainland Southeast Asia. Our findings indicate a relatively high abundance of free-ranging wild boars in protected areas of northwest Thailand, where there is a significant interface between domestic pig farms and wild boars bordering Myanmar. Wild boars were also observed in the northern region, bordering Lao PDR, and in the central and southern regions of Thailand. These findings highlight the need for ASF surveillance in border areas. The study also found that the presence of wild boars is linked to deep forest cover, elevation, and distance to water bodies, in contrast, a high density of human population, rainfed cropland, and irrigated cropland were negatively associated. These results are valuable for planning risk mitigation strategies against ASF infection in wild boars and domestic pigs in Thailand and Southeast Asia for transboundary disease surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.