ArticleScientific reports2025
The impact of emotion on temporal prediction ability in different timing contexts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our ability to predict temporal events (TP) is dynamically modulated by contextual factors (i.e., different predictive contexts) and closely intertwined with emotional states, shaping our adaptive responses within the environment. While studies have extensively probed how emotions distort time perception, their impact on predictive ability remains unexplored. Here, we investigated emotions' impact on temporal prediction. Participants (N = 23) completed a standard implicit TP task and its emotional version (TP-E), using positive (i.e., joy), negative (i.e., fear), and neutral faces as visual stimuli. Reaction times (RTs) to the target were recorded in two predictive contexts: rhythmic (i.e., interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were constant, 900 ms) and single-interval condition (i.e., target's timing estimation was based on the prior exposure of the train of stimuli) and random (no-time context). We found a specific decrease in RTs, in the single-interval context, when fearful stimuli were used, compared to neutral stimuli. This suggests that negative emotion influences temporal prediction, aligning with emotional adjustments in processing threatening situations, including modulation of physiological arousal, cognitive appraisal, and time estimation. Indeed, such modulation of RTs, specifically in the single-interval condition, may be attributed to improved memory and attention, essential cognitive abilities for single-based predictions, enhanced by the exposure to fearful stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.