Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40121257›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Identification of superficial invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes by multiple ultrasonographic vascular imaging.

Lin Li, Wenjuan Lu, Hongyan Deng, Wenqin Chen, Hua Shu, Pingyang Zhang, Xinhua Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lin Li *Department of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Wenjuan Lu *Department of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Hongyan DengDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Wenqin ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Hua ShuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Pingyang ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. zhpy28@126.com.
Xinhua YeDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China. ultrasoundye@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore whether superficial invasive lymphomas and indolent lymphomas could be identified by Ultrasonographic vascular imaging. A retrospective study enrolled 82 lymphoma patients. According to proliferation rates and clinical course, the lymph nodes were classified as invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes. All patients underwent ultrasound (US) with three established techniques: color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), angio plus ultrasound imaging (AngioPLUS™), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Qualitative and quantitative parameters from the two groups were compared. Finally, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) and regression analysis were used to compare the differences between the two groups and determine the diagnostic efficiency of the three techniques for differentiating invasive lymphoma from indolent lymphoma. The types of blood flow distribution between invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes were statistically different in all three Ultrasound techniques. In CDFI, invasive or indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes were determined by resistance index (RI) (p < 0.001). AngioPLUSTM offered better blood flow performance and diagnostic sensitivity than CDFI. In CEUS, the differences between the two groups in necrosis and arrival time (ATM) (p = 0.026, 0.043) were statistically significant. Finally, CDFI combined with CEUS had the highest diagnostic sensitivity of 98.1%. Interobserver agreements for qualitative parameters were all excellent. Ultrasonographic Vascular imaging is useful in identifying invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes, and CDFI combined with CEUS had the highest diagnostic sensitivity, which can guide clinicians to make more accurate diagnosis and better treatment for patients.

Indexed as

Lymph NodesLymphomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveUltrasonographyUltrasonography, Doppler, ColorContrast MediaAggressivenessAngio plusCEUSColor Doppler flowLymphoma

Identifiers

PMID40121257
PMCPMC11929894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.