ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization of commercial SNP arrays and the generation of a high-efficiency GenoBaits Peanut 10K panel.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An advanced genotyping tool to inspect grapevine variability: the AxiomFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To create a more comprehensive genetic analysis panel for peanuts, three high-density SNP panels were exploited. The refined SNP panel, PHR0301_Ah10K, comprises 10,000 SNP sites and demonstrated outstanding performance in sequence data analysis. It recorded the highest proportions of 99.53%, 96.48%, and 59.72% for the SNPs with minor allele frequency thresholds of MAF > 5%, MAF > 10%, and MAF > 20%, respectively. Moderate polymorphic information content (PIC) values were observed, with an average of 0.26, suggesting that the optimized SNP panel is informative. However, the PIC value for the four panels were skewed due to the small population size and limited genetic diversity (GD), as evidenced by the Kinship, PCA, and LD decay analyses. However, PHR0301_Ah10K demonstrated superior performance compared to the others in terms of variance explained in the PCA analysis while the outcomes of the genetic analyses confirmed its genotyping ability in peanut. The putative SNP sites associated with increased oleic acid levels have been integrated into this panel and validated, thus significantly enhancing its breeding potential. Moreover, the cost of genotyping by target sequencing (GBTS) using this panel is less than $9 per sample, making it more affordable. Due to its exceptional informativeness, cost-effectiveness, and breeding potential, we recommend this SNP panel for GBTS in peanut.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.