ArticleScientific reports2025
An innovative wearable device for sensing mechanoreceptor activation during touch.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Touch Triggers Mechanotransduction in Cutaneous Mechanoreceptors.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combined studies on the biophysical properties and friction-induced vibrations measured from the fingerpad during touch have yielded promising results. Thus, the ensuing investigation focuses on the underlying mechanism of how surface's roughness affects tactile perception by analysing the finger friction-induced vibrations signals so as to identify the activation of skin mechanoreceptors. The test consists in measuring the skin friction-induced vibrations through the finger sliding against different surfaces' roughness by dint of a wearable augmented finger. The test illustrates that the magnitude of the vibration acceleration signal increases the rougher the surface is, which follows the trends observed in the scientific literature. A notable correlation was identified between amplitude and spacing parameters, validating the robustness of the measurements. To ensure data comparability, parameters such as normal force and sliding direction were meticulously controlled for each participant. Furthermore, the advanced signal processing strategy uncovered additional parameters related to the activation of skin mechanoreceptors, providing deeper insights into what can be perceived by the finger during tactile exploration. Correlations between these signal parameters and the topographical characteristics of the surfaces were explored, demonstrating that the magnitude of several parameters increased with surface roughness. These findings highlight the capabilities of the innovative device to discriminate different touch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.