Trial reportBritish journal of anaesthesia2025
Plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intranasal oxytocin in nonpregnant adults.
Trial report in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Oxytocin and Effects on Sensory Function in Healthy Volunteers
A Pharmacokinetic Study of Intravenous and Intranasal Oxytocin in Healthy Subjects
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Music's context-dependent influence on oxytocin, social bonding, and emotion regulation: a systematic review.Frontiers in cognition · 2025Pooled it
- Intravenous Oxytocin Has no Effect on Ad Libitum Food Intake or Postprandial Plasma Glucose Concentrations in Individuals With Obesity: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Crossover Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Trial
- Oxytocin Deficiency in Childhood and Adolescence: Clinical Features, Diagnostic Challenges and Therapeutic Perspectives.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe development of oxytocin as a therapeutic agent outside of obstetrics has been hampered by antibody-based assays that lack specificity, leading to inconsistent and incompletely reported pharmacokinetic models to guide drug dosing. This study describes the population plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intranasal oxytocin using a sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (LC/MS) assay.
methodsTwo studies in healthy adult men and nonpregnant women were performed, the first with intravenous oxytocin 16.7 μg over 1 or 10 min and the second with intravenous oxytocin 13.7 μg over 30 min and, on a separate day, intranasal oxytocin 100 μg (n=24). Venous plasma oxytocin concentration was measured using LC/MS and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using NONMEM.
resultsThe pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxytocin were well described by a two-compartment model (0% bias, 18% median inaccuracy). The two-compartment model for intranasal oxytocin was characterised by substantial subject-to-subject variability (9% median bias, 47% median inaccuracy). Nasal oxytocin bioavailability was 0.7%. Oxytocin samples assayed with LC/MS were systematically higher than simultaneous samples assayed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
conclusionsThe pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxytocin are well described by a two-compartment model. The low bioavailability (<1%) and large intersubject variability in plasma oxytocin after intranasal dosing could partially explain the inconsistent reports of oxytocin efficacy in the clinical literature with this delivery method. A publicly available simulator was created to guide oxytocin dosing in future studies. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT03929367 (Study 1) and NCT05672667 (Study 2).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.