ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025
The optimal timing for initiating oral anticoagulant in ischemic stroke combined with non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: A real-world big data analysis.
Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy and safety of Fuzheng traditional Chinese medicine injections in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Comparative analysis of global and Chinese trends in the burden of ischemic stroke attributable to secondhand smoke from 1990-2021.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025Article
- Early anticoagulation after ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation: Moving beyond habitual delay.Brain circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are essential in preventing stroke recurrence in patients with ischemic stroke (IS) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), though they carry a bleeding risk. Balancing the benefits and risks of anticoagulant therapy and determining the optimal timing for initiation are critical. This real-world study investigated optimal timing for OAC initiation post-IS and evaluated drug selection using data from the National Health and Medical Big Data (Eastern) Center, covering IS records from 1564 hospitals in Jiangsu (2018-2021). Using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox model analysis, we compared outcomes between OAC initiators and non-initiators at different time points. Results showed that initiating OAC within 3 days for mild IS (HR, 0.82 [95 % CI, 0.71-0.94, p = 0.024]), within 6 days for moderate IS (HR, 0.76 [95 % CI, 0.65-0.89, p = 0.004]), and within 11 days for severe IS (HR, 0.89 [95 % CI, 0.78-0.97, p = 0.032]) was associated with better outcomes. New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) demonstrated favorable effectiveness and safety profiles compared to warfarin, without increasing bleeding risk (HR, 0.85 [95 % CI, 0.73-0.98, p = 0.038]). Based on these observational findings, we suggest considering early NOAC initiation for mild and moderate IS, while carefully assessing stroke progression and bleeding risk before anticoagulation in severe IS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.