ArticleVirologica Sinica2025
Virus profiling of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in hospitalized non-COVID-19 adult patients with pulmonary infection from November 2020 to November 2021.
Article in Virologica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying the cause of respiratory tract infections is important for reducing the burden of diagnosis and treatment. To assess viral etiologies of hospitalized patients with pulmonary infection, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens were collected from non-COVID-19 adult patients (n = 333, including patients with lower respiratory tract infection, tuberculosis, lung cancer, and pulmonary nodules) between November 2020 and November 2021. Multiple common respiratory pathogens were detected using multiplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. The result showed that at least one virus was identified in 35.44% (118/333) of the cases. Among these, influenza virus was the most commonly identified, followed by the parainfluenza virus, coronavirus, human rhinoviruses, and human respiratory syncytial viruses. The tuberculosis group demonstrated the highest viral detection rate, yet paradoxically exhibited the lowest co-infection rate. In contrast, the highest co-infection frequency was observed in the pulmonary nodules group. Patients with viral infections exhibited more severe clinical symptoms compared to those without detected viral infections. However, this observation was only noted in the lower respiratory tract infection group among the different disease groups. Notably, among patients infected with a specific virus, there were no significant differences in viral load between single and co-infections. Our study identified the major causative agents in hospitalized adult patients with pulmonary infection, offering insights for precise disease diagnosis and the prevention of unnecessary use of antimicrobial drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.