ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2025
Dissecting RNA selectivity mediated by tandem RNA-binding domains.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Massively parallel characterization of RNA G-quadruplex stability and molecular recognition.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Inherent Specificity and Variation Sensitivity as Quantitative Metrics for RBP Binding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- RNA functional modulation by Mitoxantrone via RNA structural ensemble repartitioning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Contributions of Folded and Disordered Domains to RNA Binding by HNRNPR.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA-protein interactions are pivotal to proper gene regulation. Many RNA-binding proteins possess multiple RNA-binding domains; however, how these domains interplay to select and regulate RNA targets remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate three multidomain proteins, Musashi-1, Musashi-2, and unkempt, which share a high degree of RNA specificity, a common feature across RNA-binding proteins. We used massively parallel in vitro assays with unprecedented depth with random or naturally derived RNA sequences and find that individual domains within a protein can have differing affinities, specificities, and motif spacing preferences. We conducted large scale competition assays between these proteins and determined how individual protein specificities and affinities influence competitive binding. Integration of binding and regulation in cells with in vitro specificities showed that target selection involves a combination of the protein intrinsic specificities described here, but cellular context is critical to drive these proteins to motifs in specific transcript regions. Finally, evolutionarily conserved RNA regions displayed evidence of binding multiple RBPs in cultured cells, and these RNA regions represent the highest affinity targets. This work emphasizes the importance of in vitro and in cultured cells studies to fully profile RNA-binding proteins and highlights the complex modes of RNA-protein interactions and the contributing factors in target selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.