ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2025
Improving Medical Student Surgery Notes Through Near-Peer Targeted Education: A Qualitative Analysis.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Student Competency in Outpatient Documentation: Insights From the 2025 CERA Clerkship Directors Study.Family medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIt is necessary for medical students (MSs) to develop proficiency in medical documentation before residency; however, there is limited education focused on this task. We conducted a qualitative analysis of surgical clerkship note evaluations to create an intervention to improve note writing skills and utilized post-intervention assessments to determine the effect on the quality of clerkship student notes.
methodsAn intervention consisting of an in-person senior MS led lecture during the surgery clerkship orientation focused on Subjective-Objective-Assessment-Plan (SOAP) notes was introduced to MS with limited prior note writing education. Examples of complete and accurate surgical SOAP notes were discussed in-person and shared online. Reports from note assessments were analyzed for four clerkship cycles (2 pre-intervention and 2 post-intervention). Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare assessment responses pre-intervention and post-intervention. Thematic analysis was performed on open-ended responses focused on areas for improvement from the anonymized evaluations.
resultsOne hundred seventy-one total note assessments were evaluated (85 pre-intervention and 86 post-intervention). Pre-intervention, MS struggled with note organization and lack of inclusion of patient-centered language within their documentation. Post-intervention, students struggled less frequently with flow and chronology of notes but had continued opportunities to improve in concise and organized presentation of information. Students improved in their ability to provide a one-liner, prioritize a differential diagnosis, and organize and structure their notes effectively. Feedback focused on advanced skills including plan specificity, discharge details and parameters, or advanced physical exam finding documentation.
conclusionsMS improved their SOAP format note writing skills in response to a targeted near-peer led educational intervention. Remaining growth opportunities in note writing skills appear more connected to evolving clinical reasoning and surgery-specific knowledge which can evolve with ongoing exposure and further education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.