ArticleGenetics2025
A model of Hill-Robertson interference caused by purifying selection in a nonrecombining genome.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coevolution of Codependent Hosts and Symbionts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- HJ Muller and the Relationship Between Sex Chromosome Degeneration and the Evolution of Dosage Compensation.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Review
- Sex chromosome evolution in haploid plants: Microchromosomes, disappearing chromosomes, and giant chromosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new approach to modeling the effects of Hill-Robertson interference on levels of adaptation and patterns of variability in a nonrecombining genome or genomic region is described. The model assumes a set of L diallelic sites subject to reversible mutations between beneficial and deleterious alleles, with the same selection coefficient at each site. The assumption of reversibility allows the system to reach a stable statistical equilibrium with respect to the frequencies of deleterious mutations, in contrast to many previous models that assume irreversible mutations to deleterious alleles. The model is therefore appropriate for understanding the long-term properties of nonrecombining genomes such as Y chromosomes, and is applicable to haploid genomes or to diploid genomes when there is intermediate dominance with respect to the effects of mutations on fitness. Approximations are derived for the equilibrium frequencies of deleterious mutations, the effective population size that controls the fixation probabilities of mutations at sites under selection, the nucleotide site diversity at neutral sites located within the nonrecombining region, and the site frequency spectrum for segregating neutral variants. The approximations take into account the effects of linkage disequilibrium on the genetic variance at sites under selection. Comparisons with published and new computer simulation results show that the approximations are sufficiently accurate to be useful, and can provide insights into a wider range of parameter sets than is accessible by simulation. The relevance of the findings to data on nonrecombining genome regions is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.